Ford GT
4th Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,261
From: Maryland
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
the vette is one of the best bang for the buck cars there is. outperforms cars 2 and 3 times the price. so people will still pay more for less, thats why people still buy certain porsche's, lambo's, etc
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 751
From: Akron, OH
RE: Ford GT
From what I'v heard he is supposed to run ***** AKA "Wolverine" sometime and I can't wait till the vid hits!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
is my username.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 13,808
From: Earth
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: MustangMadness7
+1. You cant be ocmparing cars to the new Z06, otherwise cars like Vipers, Lambo's, Porsches, and some ferrari's are a waste of money.
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
the vette is one of the best bang for the buck cars there is. outperforms cars 2 and 3 times the price. so people will still pay more for less, thats why people still buy certain porsche's, lambo's, etc
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/a...5501706603.htm
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 627
From: Oahu, Hawaii
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,479
From: Milwaukee, WI
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: Ahnial8u
From what I'v heard he is supposed to run ***** AKA "Wolverine" sometime and I can't wait till the vid hits!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
From what I'v heard he is supposed to run ***** AKA "Wolverine" sometime and I can't wait till the vid hits!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,479
From: Milwaukee, WI
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: 99GTvert
you get what you paid for
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/a...5501706603.htm
ORIGINAL: MustangMadness7
+1. You cant be ocmparing cars to the new Z06, otherwise cars like Vipers, Lambo's, Porsches, and some ferrari's are a waste of money.
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
the vette is one of the best bang for the buck cars there is. outperforms cars 2 and 3 times the price. so people will still pay more for less, thats why people still buy certain porsche's, lambo's, etc
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
This car was never meant as mentioned above to compete with the Vette. And for $80K more I hope it would pull because limited production or not no-one would buy this car if a $70K Corvette would out-perform it. A Corvette is an established car and I don't see Ford trying to introduce a car to compete in it's class. The Mustang proved it to the Camaro in a sense.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/a...5501706603.htm
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 751
From: Akron, OH
RE: Ford GT
ORIGINAL: CobraSnake
he got beat by a SRT at the end WTF???? It has over 1000rwhp and tq and it just barely broke 10s WTF????
ORIGINAL: Ahnial8u
From what I'v heard he is supposed to run ***** AKA "Wolverine" sometime and I can't wait till the vid hits!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
From what I'v heard he is supposed to run ***** AKA "Wolverine" sometime and I can't wait till the vid hits!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...1f0168b578.htm
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
RE: Ford GT
The thread starter obviously has one intention here, and that is to flame, even if he's doing it in a subtle mannor.
Anyone who says "looks" killed the F-Body, not "performance" is off, way off. It was neither, it was the lack of all around friendliness.
As for the Corvette, being a 'bang for the buck car', eh, I almost think I would differ.
No car that costs more than 35-40K is a 'bang for the buck car'
take a basic Mustang GT for less than the difference between it (28K) and a Z06 (70K) you can make the GT out run, and out handle the Z06.. take a srt-4.. for less than that you can make it faster, and handle better as wel..
my opinion,,
Anyone who says "looks" killed the F-Body, not "performance" is off, way off. It was neither, it was the lack of all around friendliness.
As for the Corvette, being a 'bang for the buck car', eh, I almost think I would differ.
No car that costs more than 35-40K is a 'bang for the buck car'
take a basic Mustang GT for less than the difference between it (28K) and a Z06 (70K) you can make the GT out run, and out handle the Z06.. take a srt-4.. for less than that you can make it faster, and handle better as wel..
my opinion,,