The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

5.0 Mustang VS 2005+ V6 = Even?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2009, 08:26 PM
  #11  
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member
 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,788
Default

Originally Posted by Stone629
You can't look at the HP/torque ratings of two cars, especially two cars that have a 20 year gap between them, and tell which one is faster. They're both 15 second cars stock. A 2006+ SI only has 197 hp, and 137 lbs tq, and they can run a high 14 stock.


If you don't care, don't post. This is what this section is for.
Makes perfect sense with the SI comment, but many Fox Mustangs were knocking on the 13 second door with little modifications. The LX's ran 14.4's stock while the GT's ran high 14's, thanks in part to their weight. The sn197 has better gearing(3:31 I believe) but they weigh more and make less power and torque. A well maintained 5.0 will beat a Mustang 4.0 v6. And as for the don't care, don't post comment, this thread was ORIGINALLY posted up in the 5.0 TECH section and then Moved here. I made my first comment when it was in the 5.0 section, because real people actually have real problems with their cars and this "newer" member comes in and spits out which one is faster thread. If he had read the rules and posted in the 5.0 talk section my answer would not have been as brash. And 99GTvert, I have nothing against you man, but chill out. It's just a forum.
NoGo95GT is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 08:42 PM
  #12  
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
Default

Originally Posted by NoGo95GT
Makes perfect sense with the SI comment, but many Fox Mustangs were knocking on the 13 second door with little modifications. The LX's ran 14.4's stock while the GT's ran high 14's, thanks in part to their weight. The sn197 has better gearing(3:31 I believe) but they weigh more and make less power and torque. A well maintained 5.0 will beat a Mustang 4.0 v6. And as for the don't care, don't post comment, this thread was ORIGINALLY posted up in the 5.0 TECH section and then Moved here. I made my first comment when it was in the 5.0 section, because real people actually have real problems with their cars and this "newer" member comes in and spits out which one is faster thread. If he had read the rules and posted in the 5.0 talk section my answer would not have been as brash. And 99GTvert, I have nothing against you man, but chill out. It's just a forum.
Ahh, gotcha. I didn't realize your post was pre-move, lol!

You're exactly right about the 5.0. It doesn't take much at all ($$ or parts) to open those things up. I think that has a lot to do with why they are still a popular car years later.
Stone629 is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 08:50 PM
  #13  
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member
 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,788
Default

I apologize for coming off rude earlier, but man, some people can really just get on my nerves when it comes to posting before reading the forum rules. I can only feel for the moderators! LOL! But yeah, the 5.0's are pretty potent runners(not the 94-95 too much), but the Fox's. I have many articles from the early 90's where a LX runs 13.8's@98 with nothing more than bumped timing, Flow's, K&N and sticky tires. Now if an s197 can duplicate these times with similar "mods" then fine, I'll pick the 4.0 to be the faster car. And with the pocket rocket crowd, their main advantage is their weight and very linear powerband's. I am sure you can attest since you have an SI, if I am not mistaken?
NoGo95GT is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 09:33 PM
  #14  
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
Default

Originally Posted by NoGo95GT
I apologize for coming off rude earlier, but man, some people can really just get on my nerves when it comes to posting before reading the forum rules. I can only feel for the moderators! LOL! But yeah, the 5.0's are pretty potent runners(not the 94-95 too much), but the Fox's. I have many articles from the early 90's where a LX runs 13.8's@98 with nothing more than bumped timing, Flow's, K&N and sticky tires. Now if an s197 can duplicate these times with similar "mods" then fine, I'll pick the 4.0 to be the faster car. And with the pocket rocket crowd, their main advantage is their weight and very linear powerband's. I am sure you can attest since you have an SI, if I am not mistaken?
Had an 08 SI sedan, but I ditched it for the GT. The super low gearing is what gets those SIs moving, but the power band doesn't come around until 6k rpms, and hits the rev limiter at 8500, so its one of those cars that you have to be on your toes to drive. The gears are close ratio though, so once you get in the power, its easy to stay there (but its a mighty small window to stay in). Its a lot like the 4.0 S197 though, whereas mods don't do jack for them. What you buy is what you get unless you've got some serious loot to sink into them (FI, etc). You can gear a 4.0, tune it, etc, but its not going to respond anything like the 5.0 will/does.
Stone629 is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 09:35 PM
  #15  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Stock good running '87-'93 5.0's can run mid 14's all day long with a driver mod. S197 sixxers are only capable of 15 secs flat.
83gtragtop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MusBBad95
New Member Area
7
08-17-2015 09:39 PM
Jacob4589
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
08-17-2015 09:34 PM
Soldier GT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
9
08-12-2015 03:46 PM
05slpGT
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
4
08-12-2015 02:32 PM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: 5.0 Mustang VS 2005+ V6 = Even?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 AM.