V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

3.8L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #31  
tims 88 4's Avatar
tims 88 4
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,659
From:
Default RE: 3.8L?

we have one sitting in the showroom at my work
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #32  
Durr727's Avatar
Durr727
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,605
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: mustangman02232


ORIGINAL: hotcar

he knew we were racing we went out to a long country road. plus we aint got to worry about cops i live in a town in georgia with only 2,000 people
ORIGINAL: hotcar

he hasnt done anything to his truck and i have a supercharged v6 but he didnt know that i raced him today and spanked him bad. he didnt say anything else.
[&:] anyone else?
I'm gonna have to call [sm=bs.gif]
what kind of s/c, how much psi are u running, can we see some pics?
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #33  
Durr727's Avatar
Durr727
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,605
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: 3.8L?

And I have a hard time believeing that someone with a s/c sixer does not know what 3.8l is, what is rwhp, and that he could only think of 1 thing to buy performance wise for $300.

ORIGINAL: hotcar

cold air intake, is all i can think of.
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:17 AM
  #34  
MustangMike2001's Avatar
MustangMike2001
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,164
From: Nashville, TN
Default RE: 3.8L?

[/quote]

http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/N...ecs/?print=yes

the 4x4's were rated 190/250. the 2wd had the exact same engine. the ratings were lower 2wd's to satisfy insurance companies.
[/quote]

Wrong... The 4x4 also has a 4.3L V6 but it's the 190hp version like they put in the Blazer SUV. It is not underrated and if it was I'm sure I would have heard about it in the four years I was active on S10 forums and not years later on a Mustang site. They also made 150 hp, 160hp, 165hp 175hp and 195hp 4.3 V6 engines over the different years and models.
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #35  
MustangMike2001's Avatar
MustangMike2001
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,164
From: Nashville, TN
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: Durr727


ORIGINAL: MustangMike2001


Thank god for Florida weather.

Yeah that picture was from when I had went up to Michigan one year for Christmas. I didn't think I was going to be able to drive back as bad as the streets were but It suprised me and drove really well even with balding tires.
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #36  
MustangMike2001's Avatar
MustangMike2001
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,164
From: Nashville, TN
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: hotcar

he hasnt done anything to his truck and i have a supercharged v6 but he didnt know that i raced him today and spanked him bad. he didnt say anything else.
So you're saying you don't even know what 3.8L means but you've got a supercharger?
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:27 AM
  #37  
232_01mustang's Avatar
232_01mustang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 412
From:
Default RE: 3.8L?

yeah...sorry i did all the work that was done on "sunkist" and im positive it had 197hp bub...just get over it [&:]
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:43 AM
  #38  
MustangMike2001's Avatar
MustangMike2001
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,164
From: Nashville, TN
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: 232_01mustang

yeah...sorry i did all the work that was done on "sunkist" and im positive it had 197hp bub...just get over it [&:]

Yeah well I'm afraid you're wrong and I find it very sad that you put so much work into a vehicle and you still know nothing about it.
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:57 AM
  #39  
cobra232's Avatar
cobra232
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,594
From:
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: MustangMike2001
http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/N...ecs/?print=yes

the 4x4's were rated 190/250. the 2wd had the exact same engine. the ratings were lower 2wd's to satisfy insurance companies.
[/quote] The 4x4 also has a 4.3L V6 but it's the 190hp version like they put in the Blazer SUV. It is not underrated and if it was I'm sure I would have heard about it in the four years I was active on S10 forums and not years later on a Mustang site. They also made 150 hp, 160hp, 165hp 175hp and 195hp 4.3 V6 engines over the different years and models.
[/quote]

as for the 2000 model year do you really believe that they used two differeent 4.3 ratings??? not a chance. it too expensive to mass produce 2 different models. the injector is the same,intake,T-body,cam everything is the same. there is no real difference between the 2 for power production. before 2000 yes there was 2 different outputs based on Vin code. 2000-2003 and up it was vin code W only. from there it was Vin X which was the same power output just different emissions standards

the older ones back in 94 had either a W code or an Z code. the W Vin code was the high output vortech while the Z was the non vortech 4.3 and a lower rating. they did away with that in 2000 like i said before.


Old Nov 23, 2006 | 01:18 AM
  #40  
Durr727's Avatar
Durr727
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,605
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: 3.8L?


ORIGINAL: MustangMike2001


ORIGINAL: Durr727


ORIGINAL: MustangMike2001


Thank god for Florida weather.

Yeah that picture was from when I had went up to Michigan one year for Christmas. I didn't think I was going to be able to drive back as bad as the streets were but It suprised me and drove really well even with balding tires.
yeah that must suck, does like the engine have trouble starting up..i coldest down here is lik 50 so i wouldnt know lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.