Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE
#1
Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE
Just reading up on the challenger. Their V6 is smaller than ours at 3.5L but Dodge is claiming 250 hp. That seems like a lot for that size engine. Challenger appears to be a bit heavier than the Mustang. I wonder how these stack up in 0-60 and quarter mile times?
#3
RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE
Well that is 40 more hp than what we have. Probably would come down to the driver. You can check the specs here...
http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen.../se/index.html
http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen.../se/index.html
#5
RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE
ORIGINAL: Wishbone
Well that is 40 more hp than what we have. Probably would come down to the driver. You can check the specs here...
http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen.../se/index.html
Well that is 40 more hp than what we have. Probably would come down to the driver. You can check the specs here...
http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen.../se/index.html
The Challenger SE base weight is 3,720 lbs.
The Mustang V6 base weight is 3,300 lbs.
That extra 40hp needs to compensate for the 420lb difference. So I do agree that it may just come down to the driver.
#7
RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE
ORIGINAL: knucklebuster
My wife has a 08 3.5 HO charger. I can tell you that it is faster than my 4.0 stang, and it wieghs 1000lbs more.
My wife has a 08 3.5 HO charger. I can tell you that it is faster than my 4.0 stang, and it wieghs 1000lbs more.