Some one educate me on the prochamber
12-16-2007, 08:23 PM
#2
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 732
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
IMO the prochamber is really not worth it when you can get a Pypes O/R h-pipe for $180. You will see about 6rwhp from any O/R pipe, but will lose some low end torque. If you want more power then this probably isn't the best mod, but if you want your car louder then get it.
12-16-2007, 08:36 PM
#3
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 101
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
From what I hear, the off road pro chamber is suppose to be quieter than both offroad XorH.
I think all the offroad pipes will make the same power with the X probably making just a lil more.
It really depends on what sound u prefer. Check sound clips on here or Youtube.
I have the Off Road Prochamber with the borla stinger, it's pretty loud.
I chose this because I wanted a deep rumble sound without that raspiness.
I think all the offroad pipes will make the same power with the X probably making just a lil more.
It really depends on what sound u prefer. Check sound clips on here or Youtube.
I have the Off Road Prochamber with the borla stinger, it's pretty loud.
I chose this because I wanted a deep rumble sound without that raspiness.
12-16-2007, 09:07 PM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Danville, VA
Posts: 890
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
12-16-2007, 09:15 PM
#6
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 101
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
ORIGINAL: D_Gusler
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
What if I put a high flow cat?
12-16-2007, 10:22 PM
#7
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 177
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
Thanks guys, I think I like the sound I'm not a big fan of the raspy X's but I don't really want to be as loud as an H. Anyone go a link to that long exhaust thread? I saw it yesterday then lost it. Couldn't find it in a search.
12-17-2007, 05:29 PM
#8
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Danville, VA
Posts: 890
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
ORIGINAL: nitetimebolher
Y is there a loss with OR? Is it because of lack of back pressure?
What if I put a high flow cat?
ORIGINAL: D_Gusler
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
What if I put a high flow cat?
Installing high-flow cats in an off-road pipe is useless. The factory h-pipe flows very well, as it already has two small convertors. Not saying not to upgrade, just saying for $400 for an H with a high flow cats is stupid IMO. The sound will be just like stock as well.
12-17-2007, 06:22 PM
#9
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,918
RE: Some one educate me on the prochamber
ORIGINAL: D_Gusler
You hit the nail on the head--lack of backpressure.
Installing high-flow cats in an off-road pipe is useless. The factory h-pipe flows very well, as it already has two small convertors. Not saying not to upgrade, just saying for $400 for an H with a high flow cats is stupid IMO. The sound will be just like stock as well.
ORIGINAL: nitetimebolher
Y is there a loss with OR? Is it because of lack of back pressure?
What if I put a high flow cat?
ORIGINAL: D_Gusler
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
Prochamber = great sound muscular exhaust.
Gonna pick up power---not really.
I can't tell a difference power wise between the OR H and the prochamber. Sound wise--there is a difference. The prochamber acts more like a mid-muffler system.
BOTH lose torque from the stock mid-pipe. Some high end horsepower is gained tho. I would recommend against the o/r unless you have gears(helps make up for torq loss--not major, but noticable).
What if I put a high flow cat?
Installing high-flow cats in an off-road pipe is useless. The factory h-pipe flows very well, as it already has two small convertors. Not saying not to upgrade, just saying for $400 for an H with a high flow cats is stupid IMO. The sound will be just like stock as well.
there is a pretty big difference in sound between the stock cats and high-flows such as bassani or magnaflow
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 09:06 AM
