4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Cam ?s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 05:20 AM
  #31  
2000GT4.6's Avatar
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,575
From: United States
Default RE: Cam ?s

Thats the entire point, there is a point to using a stage 2 cam... it will make more power than a stage 1.

stock heads or not, shortblock or not, the stage 2 cam will make more peak and redline power, and it will make the peak power later in the band. Thats the biggest problem with the stock 2v cams... they fall off around 5500 RPM. My car pulled right to redline with the stage 2s... I picked up 30 WHP at redline and about 20 WHP at peak (5500ish) with the stage 2s. From 5500 to 6000 I lost about 3 whp... compared to 30+ before the swap.

The reason you can't get the "full" potential from a stage 2 cam isn't the head flow... its the RPM limit of the stock motor. The more agressive cam, the more it likes to rev, and you have a upper limit of around 6000-6200 RPM on a stock 2v rotating assembly.

As stated however, the differences in the two cams are so small that almost nobody could acutally spot them on a dyno. Were talking 3-5 WHP differences at any point here.. nothing signficant.

Look at the difference between the 2 and 1... its a very small difference cam spec wise:

.560/.575 lift 225/235 .050 duration, 108 LSA
540/550 lift 224/226 duration, 110 LSA

Were just making a mountain out of a molehill here. If you want a little more agressive idle and don't mind giving up a few FT/LBs on the low side get a stage 2. If you want every bit of TQ you can get plus a nice upgrade up top get the stage 1s.

I have a hunderd dollar bill that says that nobody could acutally get in a car, and without hearing the idle tell me just by accelration if it was a stage1 or 2 cam. Like I said, 3, maybe 5 whp difference at any point in the band... you cannot detect that on your butt dyno.
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #32  
stangman1976's Avatar
stangman1976
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 427
From:
Default RE: Cam ?s

Wow lots of opinions here! I was just at www.patriotperformance.com they have nice set up's but I dont see anything flowing more than 233cfm. What would happen if I got there stage III heads on my stock block keep in mind I'm ordering a PI intake would it be worthless with stock rotating assembly? Should I stick with stage I or II? I would get heads fully assembled with adjustable cam gears the whole nine yards. Eventually I will be building the bottom end to handle20+ psi from twin turbo so I dont want to increase my comp. to much
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #33  
Silver2000stang's Avatar
Silver2000stang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 215
From: CT
Default RE: Cam ?s

its safe to run vt stage 2, you just wont see their full potential without headwork

comp stage 2(270's) might give you ptv issues
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #34  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: ben790450
Is this for real? Ok well im STILL not sure where all this is coming from!? I will address this Typhoon issue for you since you're so stuck on that. I never said the typhoon gave you power. I was just sick of everyone saying it was crap. I said it works not becuase it gives you power but becuase it fit good and worked right for me and all my friends. Didnt say itll gain you power. I just said IN MY EXPERIENCE and i explained this many times over. So whos the bitch? I mean really. Dont be a grumpy old man who has nothing better to do than argue with "21 yr old punks." If you are trying to convey that you're more mature you have really shown a sincere lack of it here. My excuse? Im 21 like you said. Whats your excuse? Aren't you like almost to 40? Wisdom doesnt always come with age. Sometimes there are little 40 yr old punks who think they know everything just becuase they've been around longer. You want respect? Earn it. So dont understand what you're so mad about? You're saying i dont know anything? Well ask me what you want to know and i'll be more than happy to explain it for you. I just explained the typhoon thing for you. So whats next?
ORIGINAL: ben790450
16 rwhp gain. Not bad if you ask me. . .
ORIGINAL: ben790450
And by the way i have someone who put the PP typhoon along with the 75 mm combo on a 125 shot application. Before and after. They gained 18 rwhp after the manifold and tb & ui.
ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6
Even the link that you posted showed many losses throughout the dyno run. I'm still waiting for you to post up your dyno sheets of before and after typhoon results (so we won't be discussing hearsay). After all you used both the PI and Typhoon said the Typhoon works great and the PI is ****, but haven't explained why or shown us dyno graphs. As for your friend gaining 18rwhp after the manifold and TB, post up his dyno sheets as well. I'd bet you that he shows a loss during the dyno run as well. Like I said before, it's not always about peak #'s, but more so the curve. If you are looing power during the run, it's not that impressive that at some point you (or your friend) would show a gain. Not trying to start a pissing contest, I got on here and gave the guy some info and you got all defensive and bent out of shape. So prove your point with before and after dyno graphs with the same setup and show me where you had no loss in HP or TQ. If you can't do that then I consider your experience hearsay, just because it looks good and may fit well, doesn't mean it works well. And a reply of "I can feel the diff" doesn't mean much to me. I gave specifics as to why I think the PI intake is a nice piece, just waiting for the same from you.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, I don't want to misunderstand you. You are now saying that something works good/ great because it fits? Did the stock PI intake not fit??
BTW I'm not grumpy, I enjoy a good debate like everyone else. You just seem to be the one that gets so defensive when someone doesn't agree w/ you. I know I'm not always right, maybe that comes with age and if someone doesn't agree w/ me, it's okay. I have peoples respect, maybe not yours but I won't loose any sleep over that.
I never said that you don't know anything, what I said was...
ORIGINAL; 01GT4.6
To me you are a young (21year old) punk that think he knows everything and wants to start a ****ing debatewith everyone
ORIGINAL: ben790450
THIS IS MY FINAL STATEMENT
So much for that being your final statement.
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #35  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: Silver2000stang

its safe to run vt stage 2, you just wont see their full potential without headwork

comp stage 2(270's) might give you ptv issues
you are correct, you can run stage 2's without head work but won't see their full potential. I've heard of people running comp 270's without PTV issues, I'm assuming they degreed them it properly. I may be wrong but I belive that comp grinds have a 5* advance.
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #36  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6

ORIGINAL: ben790450
Is this for real? Ok well im STILL not sure where all this is coming from!? I will address this Typhoon issue for you since you're so stuck on that. I never said the typhoon gave you power. I was just sick of everyone saying it was crap. I said it works not becuase it gives you power but becuase it fit good and worked right for me and all my friends. Didnt say itll gain you power. I just said IN MY EXPERIENCE and i explained this many times over. So whos the bitch? I mean really. Dont be a grumpy old man who has nothing better to do than argue with "21 yr old punks." If you are trying to convey that you're more mature you have really shown a sincere lack of it here. My excuse? Im 21 like you said. Whats your excuse? Aren't you like almost to 40? Wisdom doesnt always come with age. Sometimes there are little 40 yr old punks who think they know everything just becuase they've been around longer. You want respect? Earn it. So dont understand what you're so mad about? You're saying i dont know anything? Well ask me what you want to know and i'll be more than happy to explain it for you. I just explained the typhoon thing for you. So whats next?
ORIGINAL: ben790450
16 rwhp gain. Not bad if you ask me. . .
ORIGINAL: ben790450
And by the way i have someone who put the PP typhoon along with the 75 mm combo on a 125 shot application. Before and after. They gained 18 rwhp after the manifold and tb & ui.
ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6
Even the link that you posted showed many losses throughout the dyno run. I'm still waiting for you to post up your dyno sheets of before and after typhoon results (so we won't be discussing hearsay). After all you used both the PI and Typhoon said the Typhoon works great and the PI is ****, but haven't explained why or shown us dyno graphs. As for your friend gaining 18rwhp after the manifold and TB, post up his dyno sheets as well. I'd bet you that he shows a loss during the dyno run as well. Like I said before, it's not always about peak #'s, but more so the curve. If you are looing power during the run, it's not that impressive that at some point you (or your friend) would show a gain. Not trying to start a pissing contest, I got on here and gave the guy some info and you got all defensive and bent out of shape. So prove your point with before and after dyno graphs with the same setup and show me where you had no loss in HP or TQ. If you can't do that then I consider your experience hearsay, just because it looks good and may fit well, doesn't mean it works well. And a reply of "I can feel the diff" doesn't mean much to me. I gave specifics as to why I think the PI intake is a nice piece, just waiting for the same from you.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, I don't want to misunderstand you. You are now saying that something works good/ great because it fits? Did the stock PI intake not fit??
BTW I'm not grumpy, I enjoy a good debate like everyone else. You just seem to be the one that gets so defensive when someone doesn't agree w/ you. I know I'm not always right, maybe that comes with age and if someone doesn't agree w/ me, it's okay. I have peoples respect, maybe not yours but I won't loose any sleep over that.
I never said that you don't know anything, what I said was...
ORIGINAL; 01GT4.6
To me you are a young (21year old) punk that think he knows everything and wants to start a ****ing debatewith everyone
ORIGINAL: ben790450
THIS IS MY FINAL STATEMENT
So much for that being your final statement.
I love a good debate too. Thats why im on here so much. But i get defensive when someone calls me a little bitch and an @$$ hole.. . . like you did. So can we agree to disagree? I dont need to convince you to get the typhoon manifold. I couldn't care less what you run. You can say you hate it and its the worst thing in the world. But i will disagree with you. I have had nothing but good experiences with it. Im sorry if you've had otherwise but i dont want you convincing someone that its a piece of crap and they shouldnt get it when i've had no problems with it. Just give your opinion and move on. Thats how it works man.
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #37  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: ben790450

ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6

ORIGINAL: ben790450
Is this for real? Ok well im STILL not sure where all this is coming from!? I will address this Typhoon issue for you since you're so stuck on that. I never said the typhoon gave you power. I was just sick of everyone saying it was crap. I said it works not becuase it gives you power but becuase it fit good and worked right for me and all my friends. Didnt say itll gain you power. I just said IN MY EXPERIENCE and i explained this many times over. So whos the bitch? I mean really. Dont be a grumpy old man who has nothing better to do than argue with "21 yr old punks." If you are trying to convey that you're more mature you have really shown a sincere lack of it here. My excuse? Im 21 like you said. Whats your excuse? Aren't you like almost to 40? Wisdom doesnt always come with age. Sometimes there are little 40 yr old punks who think they know everything just becuase they've been around longer. You want respect? Earn it. So dont understand what you're so mad about? You're saying i dont know anything? Well ask me what you want to know and i'll be more than happy to explain it for you. I just explained the typhoon thing for you. So whats next?
ORIGINAL: ben790450
16 rwhp gain. Not bad if you ask me. . .
ORIGINAL: ben790450
And by the way i have someone who put the PP typhoon along with the 75 mm combo on a 125 shot application. Before and after. They gained 18 rwhp after the manifold and tb & ui.
ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6
Even the link that you posted showed many losses throughout the dyno run. I'm still waiting for you to post up your dyno sheets of before and after typhoon results (so we won't be discussing hearsay). After all you used both the PI and Typhoon said the Typhoon works great and the PI is ****, but haven't explained why or shown us dyno graphs. As for your friend gaining 18rwhp after the manifold and TB, post up his dyno sheets as well. I'd bet you that he shows a loss during the dyno run as well. Like I said before, it's not always about peak #'s, but more so the curve. If you are looing power during the run, it's not that impressive that at some point you (or your friend) would show a gain. Not trying to start a pissing contest, I got on here and gave the guy some info and you got all defensive and bent out of shape. So prove your point with before and after dyno graphs with the same setup and show me where you had no loss in HP or TQ. If you can't do that then I consider your experience hearsay, just because it looks good and may fit well, doesn't mean it works well. And a reply of "I can feel the diff" doesn't mean much to me. I gave specifics as to why I think the PI intake is a nice piece, just waiting for the same from you.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, I don't want to misunderstand you. You are now saying that something works good/ great because it fits? Did the stock PI intake not fit??
BTW I'm not grumpy, I enjoy a good debate like everyone else. You just seem to be the one that gets so defensive when someone doesn't agree w/ you. I know I'm not always right, maybe that comes with age and if someone doesn't agree w/ me, it's okay. I have peoples respect, maybe not yours but I won't loose any sleep over that.
I never said that you don't know anything, what I said was...
ORIGINAL; 01GT4.6
To me you are a young (21year old) punk that think he knows everything and wants to start a ****ing debatewith everyone
ORIGINAL: ben790450
THIS IS MY FINAL STATEMENT
So much for that being your final statement.
I love a good debate too. Thats why im on here so much. But i get defensive when someone calls me a little bitch and an @$$ hole.. . . like you did. So can we agree to disagree? I dont need to convince you to get the typhoon manifold. I couldn't care less what you run. You can say you hate it and its the worst thing in the world. But i will disagree with you. I have had nothing but good experiences with it. Im sorry if you've had otherwise but i dont want you convincing someone that its a piece of crap and they shouldnt get it when i've had no problems with it. Just give your opinion and move on. Thats how it works man.
I'm sorry for the name calling, I was wrong. And yes we can agree to disagree.
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #38  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

Thats the entire point, there is a point to using a stage 2 cam... it will make more power than a stage 1.

stock heads or not, shortblock or not, the stage 2 cam will make more peak and redline power, and it will make the peak power later in the band. Thats the biggest problem with the stock 2v cams... they fall off around 5500 RPM. My car pulled right to redline with the stage 2s... I picked up 30 WHP at redline and about 20 WHP at peak (5500ish) with the stage 2s. From 5500 to 6000 I lost about 3 whp... compared to 30+ before the swap.

The reason you can't get the "full" potential from a stage 2 cam isn't the head flow... its the RPM limit of the stock motor. The more agressive cam, the more it likes to rev, and you have a upper limit of around 6000-6200 RPM on a stock 2v rotating assembly.

As stated however, the differences in the two cams are so small that almost nobody could acutally spot them on a dyno. Were talking 3-5 WHP differences at any point here.. nothing signficant.

Look at the difference between the 2 and 1... its a very small difference cam spec wise:

.560/.575 lift 225/235 .050 duration, 108 LSA
540/550 lift 224/226 duration, 110 LSA

Were just making a mountain out of a molehill here. If you want a little more agressive idle and don't mind giving up a few FT/LBs on the low side get a stage 2. If you want every bit of TQ you can get plus a nice upgrade up top get the stage 1s.

I have a hunderd dollar bill that says that nobody could acutally get in a car, and without hearing the idle tell me just by accelration if it was a stage1 or 2 cam. Like I said, 3, maybe 5 whp difference at any point in the band... you cannot detect that on your butt dyno.
I disagree. lol. With a good tune you can see a lot more of a difference between stage 1 and 2's. But thats also not fair becuase stage 2's are MEANT for ported heads. I know you strongly disgree with me and Mitch and Scott at VT becuase by some reason you know more than all of us combined including the guys that make em but thats fine thats your opinion. Put stage 1 and 2 cams on STOCK heads and yeah you wont see that much of a difference. Put stage 1 and 2 cams in aftermarket stage 2 or 3 heads and you'll see a very big difference. Idk its like putting headers on a car and leaving the rest of the exhaust stock. Yeah sure you can do it no problem! But aren't you meant to do the rest of the exhaust too for full potential and if you call any exhaust shop wont they tell you that you should replace the mid pipe and cat back as well?
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #39  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6

ORIGINAL: ben790450

ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6

ORIGINAL: ben790450
Is this for real? Ok well im STILL not sure where all this is coming from!? I will address this Typhoon issue for you since you're so stuck on that. I never said the typhoon gave you power. I was just sick of everyone saying it was crap. I said it works not becuase it gives you power but becuase it fit good and worked right for me and all my friends. Didnt say itll gain you power. I just said IN MY EXPERIENCE and i explained this many times over. So whos the bitch? I mean really. Dont be a grumpy old man who has nothing better to do than argue with "21 yr old punks." If you are trying to convey that you're more mature you have really shown a sincere lack of it here. My excuse? Im 21 like you said. Whats your excuse? Aren't you like almost to 40? Wisdom doesnt always come with age. Sometimes there are little 40 yr old punks who think they know everything just becuase they've been around longer. You want respect? Earn it. So dont understand what you're so mad about? You're saying i dont know anything? Well ask me what you want to know and i'll be more than happy to explain it for you. I just explained the typhoon thing for you. So whats next?
ORIGINAL: ben790450
16 rwhp gain. Not bad if you ask me. . .
ORIGINAL: ben790450
And by the way i have someone who put the PP typhoon along with the 75 mm combo on a 125 shot application. Before and after. They gained 18 rwhp after the manifold and tb & ui.
ORIGINAL: 01GT4.6
Even the link that you posted showed many losses throughout the dyno run. I'm still waiting for you to post up your dyno sheets of before and after typhoon results (so we won't be discussing hearsay). After all you used both the PI and Typhoon said the Typhoon works great and the PI is ****, but haven't explained why or shown us dyno graphs. As for your friend gaining 18rwhp after the manifold and TB, post up his dyno sheets as well. I'd bet you that he shows a loss during the dyno run as well. Like I said before, it's not always about peak #'s, but more so the curve. If you are looing power during the run, it's not that impressive that at some point you (or your friend) would show a gain. Not trying to start a pissing contest, I got on here and gave the guy some info and you got all defensive and bent out of shape. So prove your point with before and after dyno graphs with the same setup and show me where you had no loss in HP or TQ. If you can't do that then I consider your experience hearsay, just because it looks good and may fit well, doesn't mean it works well. And a reply of "I can feel the diff" doesn't mean much to me. I gave specifics as to why I think the PI intake is a nice piece, just waiting for the same from you.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, I don't want to misunderstand you. You are now saying that something works good/ great because it fits? Did the stock PI intake not fit??
BTW I'm not grumpy, I enjoy a good debate like everyone else. You just seem to be the one that gets so defensive when someone doesn't agree w/ you. I know I'm not always right, maybe that comes with age and if someone doesn't agree w/ me, it's okay. I have peoples respect, maybe not yours but I won't loose any sleep over that.
I never said that you don't know anything, what I said was...
ORIGINAL; 01GT4.6
To me you are a young (21year old) punk that think he knows everything and wants to start a ****ing debatewith everyone
ORIGINAL: ben790450
THIS IS MY FINAL STATEMENT
So much for that being your final statement.
I love a good debate too. Thats why im on here so much. But i get defensive when someone calls me a little bitch and an @$$ hole.. . . like you did. So can we agree to disagree? I dont need to convince you to get the typhoon manifold. I couldn't care less what you run. You can say you hate it and its the worst thing in the world. But i will disagree with you. I have had nothing but good experiences with it. Im sorry if you've had otherwise but i dont want you convincing someone that its a piece of crap and they shouldnt get it when i've had no problems with it. Just give your opinion and move on. Thats how it works man.
I'm sorry for the name calling, I was wrong. And yes we can agree to disagree.
Ok well there we go lol. So wait not to jack the thread but wasnt it you that said you had trouble with N20 on the typhoon . . .becuase i've run it so far with no problems. . .but here soon im gonna be getting a 150 or 200 shot and i want to forsee any problems that i have. .. . . And your experience here would be appreciated
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #40  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: Cam ?s

ORIGINAL: ben790450


Ok well there we go lol. So wait not to jack the thread but wasnt it you that said you had trouble with N20 on the typhoon . . .becuase i've run it so far with no problems. . .but here soon im gonna be getting a 150 or 200 shot and i want to forsee any problems that i have. .. . . And your experience here would be appreciated
no I think you misunderstood what I said in the Typhoon thread. I have NEVER used the Typhoon, I was saying that I had learned from others mistakes which to me is better than making my own mistake. But what I think you are referring to was reply #7, that was a quote that I had taken from the link I posted about someone else who lost 40hp. I know that most people go with an aluminum intake because of fear of a nitrous backfire, but I have seen a nitrous backfire take out an aluminum intake and it wasn't pretty. I'd say the damage was worse that it would have been if it would have been a plastic intake.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.