COMP vs CMS vs HITECH!!!
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
Yes thank you, i can read threads too. BTW im GTRACER2000 on corral. The guy who started that thread, the one he responded to. But then i talked to another guy on modded mustangs, who has a 2000 GT (Like me), and said he doesnt have any stalling problems. Haha thats funny.
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
From: Houston, Tx
What are you talking about not run worth ****? Yes stalling is due to the tune, and is a reason why his cam did that. Trying to tune the stall is complicated from what my tuner told me. But if managible it can be very affective. I dont know what or why you seem to have a personal vendetta against me?
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
What are you talking about not run worth ****? Yes stalling is due to the tune, and is a reason why his cam did that. Trying to tune the stall is complicated from what my tuner told me. But if managible it can be very affective. I dont know what or why you seem to have a personal vendetta against me?
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
From: Houston, Tx
I appriciate it but i dont think it will be just that. I dont mind losing low end power because i want a cam that will pull super hard when racing from a roll. Even if i go to the track, i want the car to have the best performance possible while staying stock block and no flycut pistons or notched pistons. I will upgrade the springs though and rev to 6500 rpm. I know my DD will be affected but if i was really bothered by that fact i wouldnt choose this cam. Thats why i made it clear in my first post that its a big cam. Im well aware of the pros and cons and the pro's are definatly better than the cons, to me. I do have 4:10's that will help me with the down low performance. But when racing im never below 3500 rpm. Excecpt from a dig and for no longer than .1 seconds if that. Its minimal to shave better times off the track, and have greater overall performance (power and time wise). If you do not want to lose low end power then these cams are not for you, but if you do want to make great power up top and dont mind losing low end power, like me, then this is a great cam.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
I appriciate it but i dont think it will be just that. I dont mind losing low end power because i want a cam that will pull super hard when racing from a roll. Even if i go to the track, i want the car to have the best performance possible while staying stock block and no flycut pistons or notched pistons. I will upgrade the springs though and rev to 6500 rpm. I know my DD will be affected but if i was really bothered by that fact i wouldnt choose this cam. Thats why i made it clear in my first post that its a big cam. Im well aware of the pros and cons and the pro's are definatly better than the cons, to me. I do have 4:10's that will help me with the down low performance. But when racing im never below 3500 rpm. Excecpt from a dig and for no longer than .1 seconds if that. Its minimal to shave better times off the track, and have greater overall performance (power and time wise). If you do not want to lose low end power then these cams are not for you, but if you do want to make great power up top and dont mind losing low end power, like me, then this is a great cam.
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
From: Houston, Tx
Deputy CatDog - To Purr'tect and Explode
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,900
From: NM
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
