bbk vs. mac
#11
RE: bbk vs. mac
BBK's headers are better quality and, more importantly, have a the flange that connects all the primaries. I like the MAC Prochamber, but other than that the H and X pipes are all pretty similar unless you go stainless.
#13
RE: bbk vs. mac
askin which one sounds better is like askin someone what kind of pizza they like. We all like pizza........
ORIGINAL: cassimus
so the question i have remains which is better sounding o/r x or off road h on a 5.0.....no one can seem to answer that one its just one big long debate.
so the question i have remains which is better sounding o/r x or off road h on a 5.0.....no one can seem to answer that one its just one big long debate.
#14
RE: bbk vs. mac
ha well im gonna go with an x pipe but its back to the whole pizza thing about brand some like bbk which is cheap and some like prochamber i mean i dont know where to go lol is it true that an h pipe's "h"ness doesnt even work after 3500 rpms?
#15
RE: bbk vs. mac
I got BBK equals, BBK Catted X pipe and magnaflows. The Primary reason I baught a X pipe was for the extra few hp. I will be straight up by saying at first I felt this set up was to quiet but after awhile it grew on me and I don't regret it. It sounds Raspy and mean.
#16
RE: bbk vs. mac
ya i have shortys bolted to a catted h pipe and dual 40 series flows and im dropping that quiet system for the o/r x pipe to get better ponies, flow, and a more aggressive sound. the setup i have right now is perfect in low rpms but silences to the point my motor is louder which isnt right for a fox body
#17
RE: bbk vs. mac
BBK headers have good quality and so do my MAC unequal lengths.I haven't had a problem with them on either of the cars that they have been installed on. I wish I could find the shorty header dyno shoot out, MAC came out on top for making power, that's what convinced me to purchase mine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM