5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2007, 06:57 PM
  #21  
Helmet86
Thread Starter
 
Helmet86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

The problem with my car is that I have trouble keeping my car to idle right but after a few tries of trying to start it without my MAF sensor, the car runs very good. Then when I turn it off, I run into the same problem. I have driven my car with the MAF sensor connected and the car runs horrible. It backfires, does not respond well when I hit the gas and even if I floor the peddle, the car does hardly moves.
Helmet86 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:00 PM
  #22  
mattdel
6th Gear Member
 
mattdel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Spfld, MA
Posts: 9,240
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

what have you done before hand? did it used to run? did you buy it like this?
mattdel is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:07 PM
  #23  
SteveSkal
2nd Gear Member
 
SteveSkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 479
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

ORIGINAL: 7upedition

no the sampling tube is the small diameter tube inside the MAF tube, where the MAF wires are located, a certain volume of air is sent through that siameter and then converted to 0-5 or 1-5 volts (cant remeber) and that is used to determine how much fuel the car needs to maintain a proper A/F ratio... It should be held in with two allen head screws.
Your still a little confused. Sure all MAF's have a tube within the meter where the actual sensor is housed but Pro-M meters do not have a removable sampling tube like a C&L meter, Pro-M calibrates their meters by the programming in the electronics housed on top of the meter. C&L on the otherhand uses the different size sampling tubes to "fool" the stock electronics into correctly calibrating the car for different size injectors. So again, disregard the comment about the sampling tube. However do be sure you're Pro-M meter is calibrated for the 24# injectors, they usually inscribe that on top of the electronics, if not you can call them with the SN and they can tell you what that meter is prgrammed for
SteveSkal is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:09 PM
  #24  
Helmet86
Thread Starter
 
Helmet86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

Actually yes, the car did not run like a 5.0 but it seemed as if the car got worst over time. A friend of mine disconnected the MAF and the car ran like an animal for a week or so. Thats when I had the trouble of keeping it on. Now I have to play with the MAF sensorby turning the car on and off with and without the sensor until it finally catches on and stays on. But when I finally have the car running, the MAF sensor is disconnected.
Helmet86 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:14 PM
  #25  
mattdel
6th Gear Member
 
mattdel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Spfld, MA
Posts: 9,240
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

still got stock cats?
mattdel is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:20 PM
  #26  
Helmet86
Thread Starter
 
Helmet86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

No i have the H- pipe flowmasters..
Helmet86 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:31 PM
  #27  
Helmet86
Thread Starter
 
Helmet86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

I also heard that PRO-M Racing no longer exist.
Helmet86 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:38 PM
  #28  
SteveSkal
2nd Gear Member
 
SteveSkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 479
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

The original Pro-M company is gone but a bunch of the guys from Pro-M went and started up another company, so essentially it's the same company and same product.
SteveSkal is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:40 PM
  #29  
Helmet86
Thread Starter
 
Helmet86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

So do yall think that if i lower my thottle body from a 75mm to a 70 or 65mm, will solve my problem?
Helmet86 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:44 PM
  #30  
mattdel
6th Gear Member
 
mattdel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Spfld, MA
Posts: 9,240
Default RE: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?

doubt it. you need to get a volt meter and start carefully watching your MAF readings, see what its doing. also check the 5v reference signal, its tied into the IAC 5v.
mattdel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
articman
General Tech
1
06-21-2018 11:45 PM
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
MusicCity615
General Tech
7
09-12-2015 07:05 AM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
09-02-2015 08:51 PM



Quick Reply: Running Better Without my MAF Sensor?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.