5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

replacing camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #21  
ckyguy68's Avatar
ckyguy68
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,103
From:
Default RE: replacing camshaft

That must be a 03 mach 1 specific issue because i know plenty of people that use c&l with no problems.

ORIGINAL: 83gtragtop

ORIGINAL: FASTBLACK

The gears are a great idea. You will not see a 50 hp increase in what you plan on doing to the car, dont be mislead. With a cold air intake you'll be wasting money unless you get if for very cheap. I know you did not ask but i would not bother with the cam, it's not needed with stock heads. Intake would be ok since it's easy to install and you can alway's use it later when you build the engine. I cant knock all C&L MA's but my experience has not been good. Exhaust is always a good idea, and of course it will sound nice. Use the money you were going to spend on the cam and get some control arms and sub-frame connectors.
They are garbage. My bodies '03 Mach had one installed and it leaned him out really bad....16:1 at 3500rpms! Dynoed at only 240rwhp on a dynojet[:'(]. Catback, high flow catted h..throttle body spacer and no C&L and it put down 298rwhp on the same dyno a month later. The shop Apex Motorsports, which is one of the biggest Ford performance shops in the SF bay area now refuses to dyno or work on cars w/C&L's.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #22  
drhoward's Avatar
drhoward
Penis Mod Erator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,531
From: Calgary Eh?
Default RE: replacing camshaft

I have heard on hereand from the guys that do tunning in my area that they are not very good

Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #23  
83gtragtop's Avatar
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,897
From: DTLA, CA
Default RE: replacing camshaft

ORIGINAL: ckyguy68

That must be a 03 mach 1 specific issue because i know plenty of people that use c&l with no problems.

ORIGINAL: 83gtragtop

ORIGINAL: FASTBLACK

The gears are a great idea. You will not see a 50 hp increase in what you plan on doing to the car, dont be mislead. With a cold air intake you'll be wasting money unless you get if for very cheap. I know you did not ask but i would not bother with the cam, it's not needed with stock heads. Intake would be ok since it's easy to install and you can alway's use it later when you build the engine. I cant knock all C&L MA's but my experience has not been good. Exhaust is always a good idea, and of course it will sound nice. Use the money you were going to spend on the cam and get some control arms and sub-frame connectors.
They are garbage. My bodies '03 Mach had one installed and it leaned him out really bad....16:1 at 3500rpms! Dynoed at only 240rwhp on a dynojet[:'(]. Catback, high flow catted h..throttle body spacer and no C&L and it put down 298rwhp on the same dyno a month later. The shop Apex Motorsports, which is one of the biggest Ford performance shops in the SF bay area now refuses to dyno or work on cars w/C&L's.
The MA they use in the setup is to large for most applications. Anyone who has taken their car to the dyno can tell you what let down they are. I've heard about this problem with many more cars then the Mach.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #24  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default RE: replacing camshaft

ive got a 76mm c+l in my fox runs perfect and defintely picked up some torque with it added.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.0muscle
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
5
Jan 11, 2016 01:17 PM
9550
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
10
Oct 26, 2015 05:01 PM
uberstang1
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
6
Sep 20, 2015 06:42 PM
MusicCity615
General Tech
7
Sep 12, 2015 07:05 AM
Art161
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
Sep 9, 2015 10:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.