5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #11  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

ORIGINAL: bouchermb

I was happy with it and I don't think most people realize what it takes to put out these type of numbers. I was at 270 RWHP after the supercharger and it took me heads, a stroker kit, custom cam, 42 lb. inj., 90 MM MAF, 255 lph FP and T-rex ext FP, among other things to get here.
270 after a supercharger on a stock build?? I'd of thought more but i GUESS it depends on the boost level run
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #12  
PRO50SC's Avatar
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,918
From: Maryland Sucka's!!
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

ORIGINAL: mjr46

ORIGINAL: bouchermb

I was happy with it and I don't think most people realize what it takes to put out these type of numbers. I was at 270 RWHP after the supercharger and it took me heads, a stroker kit, custom cam, 42 lb. inj., 90 MM MAF, 255 lph FP and T-rex ext FP, among other things to get here.
270 after a supercharger on a stock build?? I'd of thought more but i GUESS it depends on the boost level run
Yeah Mike mine dynoed at 303, bone stock everything.9 psi
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #13  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

so with a 347 I'd thought he'd be close to 450 easy.....heck if my 347 with a 100 shot doesn't hit over 400.. I'm gonna be a little disappointed
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #14  
92GreyGT's Avatar
92GreyGT
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 943
From:
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

It may be the dyno he is running on. I don't which one but doesn't one read lower than the other, Mustang vs. Dynojet?
With the early model block are you running a solid roller cam, hydraulic roller retro fit, or flat tappet? Just curious.
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #15  
WhiteWindsor's Avatar
WhiteWindsor
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,872
From: Warner Robins,GA
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

The timing is awfully low. I'm assuming since you have fi your compression is not high. I have 11.1 compression and run a total of 33 degrees. With my 357 i dynoed 365 to the wheels with h/c/i only. My numbers did a nose dive after 5950 rpms. I have a custom grind to make power to 6800, tuner said to replace my sh!tty spring with some to handle my cam 625/661, dur @.050is246/259. He seems to think i should have at least 50hp more with right springs. Your numbers are great and i'm not knocking them but i bet you have more in it. On my base run my timing was way off, it was at 19 total, it put down 319,we increased it to 33 and locked dizzy out. So just with timing adj i gained 46 hp.
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #16  
OnyxCobra's Avatar
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,467
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

Very nice numbers but I have to agree with Pro on this one, people make more than that with head/cam/boosted 302s.
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #17  
bighungrymatt's Avatar
bighungrymatt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,382
From: MISSISSIPPI
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

very nice numbers
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #18  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

Yeah, 20 total timing seems awfully low, even for a blown setup. Was it tuned to be really conservative?
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #19  
w8less's Avatar
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,396
From: KY
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

i'd be pretty pissed. you spent all that money and 392? you should be maxxing that block out right now. as in 450+
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 03:54 AM
  #20  
greenstreak9205's Avatar
greenstreak9205
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,485
From: Waterford, WI
Default RE: Dyno Numbers

what head unit are you using? maybe its not getting enough volume of air/not very efficient for a built 347? im just throwin out ideas here[>:] pretty sure thats not the case though



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.