Ahhh horrible gas milage
#11
i was getting 300-360 mile per tank but lately its dropped off the fuel pump is failing again
right now im at 160 per tank it really sucks
check your timing, you TPS settings and fuel pressure maybe its to low and its dumping extra fuel to compensate for lack of atomization
right now im at 160 per tank it really sucks
check your timing, you TPS settings and fuel pressure maybe its to low and its dumping extra fuel to compensate for lack of atomization
#12
i was getting 300-360 mile per tank but lately its dropped off the fuel pump is failing again
right now im at 160 per tank it really sucks
check your timing, you TPS settings and fuel pressure maybe its to low and its dumping extra fuel to compensate for lack of atomization
right now im at 160 per tank it really sucks
check your timing, you TPS settings and fuel pressure maybe its to low and its dumping extra fuel to compensate for lack of atomization
#15
ya i do mostly city driving, didnt think gears would help mpg lol. Thats kwl i want the 373's to. Cant seem to find a speedo fix for it though only for 355, would this be close enough?
#16
Here's a handy chart for some different applications prior to Ford switching to electronic speedometers.
5 Speed | 1983-89 | 1990-93 | 1994-98
Ratio/Tran. gear
3.27/ **** 19t **|** 21t **|** 21t
3.55/ **** 20t **|** 23t **|** 23t
3.73/ **** 21t **|** 23t **|** 23t
4.10/ **** 23t **|** 23t **|** 23t
Auto | 1983-1998
Ratio/Tran. gear
3.27/ **** 19t automatic
3.55/ **** 20t automatic
3.73/ **** 21t automatic
4.10/ **** 23t automatic
5 Speed | 1983-89 | 1990-93 | 1994-98
Ratio/Tran. gear
3.27/ **** 19t **|** 21t **|** 21t
3.55/ **** 20t **|** 23t **|** 23t
3.73/ **** 21t **|** 23t **|** 23t
4.10/ **** 23t **|** 23t **|** 23t
Auto | 1983-1998
Ratio/Tran. gear
3.27/ **** 19t automatic
3.55/ **** 20t automatic
3.73/ **** 21t automatic
4.10/ **** 23t automatic
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM