disapointing HCI build.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-28-2008, 08:11 PM

#21

LCBlackDep183

3rd Gear Member

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: Baltimore, MD

Posts: 958

I'm sure that there are people with e7's and a mild cam running better than that.

Sloppy HCI build, no tune, not surprising.

12-29-2008, 12:16 AM

#22

FORD TOUGH

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Oct 2008

Location: Virginia

Posts: 1,107

my subscription ran out

but it doesn't sound like I missed much.

12-29-2008, 08:41 AM

#23

5.0stanger

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: Howard City, MI

Posts: 5,956

Hell, I made 240 RWH and 290 RWT with ported E7's and ported stock intake and stock cam....

12-29-2008, 08:54 AM

#24

Baddog

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location:

Posts: 1,606

Portmaster advised me on a decent build once I informed him I don't plan on going F/I. Aluminum heads are superior I know that but I don't plan on boosting or gassing and for longevity sake, cast iron heads (saving cost) would make sound reasoning...

1) Comp Cams XE264HR P/N 35-349-8

2) Trick Flow Street Heat Upper and Lower

3) Windsor Jr. Heads (my idea, not his so no flame please) 1.94 1.60valves 58cc

Opinions...

Last edited by Baddog; 12-29-2008 at 02:28 PM.

12-29-2008, 09:34 AM

#25

Portmaster

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Nov 2008

Location: SC

Posts: 2,401

Quote:

Originally Posted by FORD TOUGH

my subscription ran out

but it doesn't sound like I missed much.

You can read all about it on the 5.0 magazine website. Thats what I do so I can just read what I want and skip the 180 pages of adds and 6 pages of real reading.lol

here ya go

http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...ads/index.html