clevor thinking
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,305
From: west chester
RE: clevor thinking
i will prob leave the cam it comes with in it, its pretty radical, but i am thinkin about some port work to the heads. and or switching over to the 4v and porting them out. what u think
ORIGINAL: my77stang
well pointless to buy a assembled crate if your gonna break it down.
well pointless to buy a assembled crate if your gonna break it down.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,593
From: ABQ, NM, USA
RE: clevor thinking
ORIGINAL: Brandontyler65
looks like a windsoe intake on this clevor
looks like a windsoe intake on this clevor
Don't get me wrong, I don't regret my stroker clevor at all. But that was 12 years ago when I built it.
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,305
From: west chester
RE: clevor thinking
i believe that there is a company that is starting to make them again. plus the company would supply me with the intake, for an extra 400.
also 69mach1377 what kinda numbers u puttin down, with that clevor.
also 69mach1377 what kinda numbers u puttin down, with that clevor.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,566
From: Marquette Mi
RE: clevor thinking
DO NOT PORT THE HEADS! The 2V is more than big enough to support the 302. The chances of gaining anything from porting are slim, because the engine still wont need all the airflow it already will have. It will be a high winder even with the 2V heads on it. Do yourself a favor and dont port or mess with the heads. The only thing that any 2V head needs is the bump taken out of the exhaust port
when they came on 351/400M engines. Even that is marginal and doesnt gain a huge amount.
CHI has an intake that will work. Otherwise its Ebay looking for one. the Windsor intakes wont work, mainly because the flanges are smaller than the ports. looks like I need to get outside and tear some engines down to show you guys.
when they came on 351/400M engines. Even that is marginal and doesnt gain a huge amount.
CHI has an intake that will work. Otherwise its Ebay looking for one. the Windsor intakes wont work, mainly because the flanges are smaller than the ports. looks like I need to get outside and tear some engines down to show you guys.
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,305
From: west chester
RE: clevor thinking
haha where do u live maybe you can help with this project?
ORIGINAL: THUMPIN455
DO NOT PORT THE HEADS! The 2V is more than big enough to support the 302. The chances of gaining anything from porting are slim, because the engine still wont need all the airflow it already will have. It will be a high winder even with the 2V heads on it. Do yourself a favor and dont port or mess with the heads. The only thing that any 2V head needs is the bump taken out of the exhaust port
when they came on 351/400M engines. Even that is marginal and doesnt gain a huge amount.
CHI has an intake that will work. Otherwise its Ebay looking for one. the Windsor intakes wont work, mainly because the flanges are smaller than the ports. looks like I need to get outside and tear some engines down to show you guys.
DO NOT PORT THE HEADS! The 2V is more than big enough to support the 302. The chances of gaining anything from porting are slim, because the engine still wont need all the airflow it already will have. It will be a high winder even with the 2V heads on it. Do yourself a favor and dont port or mess with the heads. The only thing that any 2V head needs is the bump taken out of the exhaust port
when they came on 351/400M engines. Even that is marginal and doesnt gain a huge amount.
CHI has an intake that will work. Otherwise its Ebay looking for one. the Windsor intakes wont work, mainly because the flanges are smaller than the ports. looks like I need to get outside and tear some engines down to show you guys.