Pipes, Boost & Juice Talk about Exhaust, Nitrous, Blowers, Turbos, Superchargers... whatever makes you go faster!

centrifical or tt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2007, 08:45 AM
  #21  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: centrifical or tt

procharged, you have a cobra fuel tank, pumps, the works, and you're only running 460RWHP? that's like watching a VHS on a plasma TV.
nanaki is offline  
Old 09-15-2007, 08:09 PM
  #22  
Mustangkiler
5th Gear Member
 
Mustangkiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,005
Default RE: centrifical or tt

Unless you plan on using an aftermarket block and making it into a strip car, just go supercharger because its less work, easier to tune, and you can max out the stock block with a supercharger.
Mustangkiler is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 03:09 PM
  #23  
turbostang21
5th Gear Member
 
turbostang21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,450
Default RE: centrifical or tt

ORIGINAL: nanaki

ORIGINAL: turbostang21

ORIGINAL: nanaki

it's not a question of which is better, it's a question of which you can afford. if you don't plan on going all out with a built motor, new fuel system, heavy duty transmission, then a turbo would be a waste of money. unless you piece together a turbo kit, they cost quite a large chunk of change to buy a KIT. most people go with a centrifugal style because they're cheap and will get you to your stock motor's threshhold just as easily as a turbo, but at half the cost.
+1....op sounds like any entry level sc would be a good fit for you. vortech makes a great sc but personally i'd go with a intercooled paxton or procharger.

ravenforbiddena lot (i'd say most)big power turbo mustangs are single turbos. i can easily get 9-950whp out of my turbo. tranny, clutch, and it being a street car are the only things keeping mea bit under 750whp
that and there's only so much power you can get before it's just a dyno queen. too much power is too hard to control and isn't really worth it. i'm getting my T installed and looking at 620-650RWHP. even that may be too much. it's more fun when the car moves instead of spins.
you don't have to tell me brotherthe suspension is a huge factor...on a mt dr i can get surprisingly good traction...but you certainly have to know how to (or how not to) get into the throttle through each and every gear (i'm still rowing myself). this is why i cringe when i see guys who wanna go from a bolt on or even a 450whp car to a 600+whp car...the difference is huge and it can be flat out dangerous if you don't know what you're doing. i pretty much keep my power level where it is all the time...but the beauty of a turbo is how easy it is to have a low/med/high/crazy high boost settings. good luck with your stang..i've been "watching" your build over time...congrats on how far you've come. too many internet builds that never happen ya know what i mean
turbostang21 is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 05:04 PM
  #24  
01snake
5th Gear Member
 
01snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,795
Default RE: centrifical or tt

i would go tt if you have the money more efficient and more power


plus im always worried about belt slippage at higher hp numbersone of the reason's when i go f/i i may stay away from s/c
01snake is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Morbid Intentions
Street/Strip
39
08-06-2011 01:08 PM
87Unicorn
2005-2014 Mustangs
8
07-16-2011 07:48 PM
poorboyracing
5.0L General Discussion
7
06-16-2009 01:58 AM
Juiced98GT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
38
07-08-2007 04:16 AM
awwimer
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
16
08-12-2003 05:06 PM



Quick Reply: centrifical or tt



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.