Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

reducing wheel hop UCA or LCA first?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010, 09:44 AM
  #11  
stang06gt
Thread Starter
 
stang06gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: IN/OH
Posts: 6
Default

thanks for the article sleeper! That was a great read. So it seems then the brackets and adjustable are for correcting suspension geometry after lowering the car. One separate question so on a mustang do you lower all four corners or do some people just lower the rear?
stang06gt is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 03:30 PM
  #12  
Sleeper_08
4th Gear Member
 
Sleeper_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,692
Default

Originally Posted by stang06gt
thanks for the article sleeper! That was a great read. So it seems then the brackets and adjustable are for correcting suspension geometry after lowering the car. One separate question so on a mustang do you lower all four corners or do some people just lower the rear?
Some people do just lower the rear and they generally seem to use the Roush springs as you can buy them in pairs instead of the set of 4 for most springs.
Sleeper_08 is offline  
Old 10-29-2010, 09:39 PM
  #13  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

I remember old school hot-rodders used to jack up their rear ends instead of drop them. They did this to avoid the dreaded lower front hinge of the LCA. And since the rear of the car will always squat down, that too was another reason their cars had that hot-rod rake.

Too bad we modern car modders do not go for that hot-rod rake anymore. I personally like that jacked up rear end looks.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 08:55 AM
  #14  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

I always thought that jacked up rear ends was so you could fit bigger rear tires, especially if they stuck out past the sheetmetal.

I like a little rake - the S197 as delivered is pretty good in this respect. I would not want much more, and I definitely don't want less either from looking at it from the outside or from inside looking out over the hoodline. The taildragger stance hasn't done anything for me since before I had my license.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 07:55 PM
  #15  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Yes, I believe you are right about that too, well at least until they found out that the bigger tires negated some of the benefits of going with a deeper rear diff gear. That, and most street rodders realized that the massively big tires really only belonged on drag-strip only cars (funny cars, rails, and other extreme drag strip cars).

And of course getting into stuff that you know all to well about: roll centers and other rolling effects around mas and pressure centroids.
A too jacked up of a rear end might account well for handling pitch but might not be so good at handling roll for lateral G handling.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
10-03-2015 06:23 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
folivier
Detailing
0
09-26-2015 02:28 PM



Quick Reply: reducing wheel hop UCA or LCA first?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.