CTS-V
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
From: CA
RE: CTS-V
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
next time dont talk unless u know what ur even talking about
this is a mustang forum so obviously i drive a mustang.. dosnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.. wats the matter u dont like ur fellow maro owners over at ls1tech.com? its ok we all know 99% of them are yuppy @ssholes
ORIGINAL: SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
ahahha...a stock escalade hauling ***? It's wayy too heavy to be fast....what kinda car do you drive?
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
we rented an 06 escalade and it hauled ***.. litteraly
you could watch the front end lift at full throttle
must have had atleast 400+ ft/lbs torque
that thing moved
we rented an 06 escalade and it hauled ***.. litteraly
you could watch the front end lift at full throttle
must have had atleast 400+ ft/lbs torque
that thing moved
this is a mustang forum so obviously i drive a mustang.. dosnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.. wats the matter u dont like ur fellow maro owners over at ls1tech.com? its ok we all know 99% of them are yuppy @ssholes
AND MAYBE IF YOUR USER NAME WASN'T LOOKINFORASTANG I WOULDN'T HAVE ASKED WHAT CAR YOU OWN SMART GUY
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
From: CA
RE: CTS-V
ORIGINAL: tl86gt
dude hes saying for an SUV it hauls ***, in which it does..... it might weigh 5500 lbs. but it still runs 0-60 in the upper sixes which is DAMN good for a full size SUV.... and if that too heavy, then how does a 4900lb chevy trailblazer SS run mid 14's with 400 hp?
dude hes saying for an SUV it hauls ***, in which it does..... it might weigh 5500 lbs. but it still runs 0-60 in the upper sixes which is DAMN good for a full size SUV.... and if that too heavy, then how does a 4900lb chevy trailblazer SS run mid 14's with 400 hp?
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,039
From:
RE: CTS-V
go ahead and quote me i never claim to be a know it all after all i came hear to learn about MY MUSTANG THAT I OWN. and why dont u go quote me about the c5 i said "i thought.." thats all different than saying "i know"
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
From: CA
RE: CTS-V
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
go ahead and quote me i never claim to be a know it all after all i came hear to learn about MY MUSTANG THAT I OWN. and why dont u go quote me about the c5 i said "i thought.." thats all different than saying "i know"
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
go ahead and quote me i never claim to be a know it all after all i came hear to learn about MY MUSTANG THAT I OWN. and why dont u go quote me about the c5 i said "i thought.." thats all different than saying "i know"
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
Anyway back to the thread starters topic...sorry about the hijack
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
RE: CTS-V
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
ur not a mustang enthusiast.. hell u havent even posted a single thread about mustangs everything u post is about ur crapmaro.
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,039
From:
RE: CTS-V
awww dont cry, tommy.
not many other $1800 cars can contend with the 5.0 in my sig
ironicaly the only cars that can - and fit in that price range... are other mustangs!
obviously a 2002 camaro that retailed for over 20 grand is going to be faster.
once again comparing apples to oranges
not many other $1800 cars can contend with the 5.0 in my sig
ironicaly the only cars that can - and fit in that price range... are other mustangs!
obviously a 2002 camaro that retailed for over 20 grand is going to be faster.
once again comparing apples to oranges
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 117
From:
RE: CTS-V
I believe MT ran a 13.2 1/4 in a CTS-v. They also commented at length about how well the car handled. It easily outhandled the GTO and 300C SRT8 in a comparison test.[8D]
Too bad it's ugly as sin...[:'(]
Too bad it's ugly as sin...[:'(]
