vettes
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
RE: vettes
Buick finally some pretty nice cars together in 86-87, still very respectable by even today's standards. And they didn't need 8 cylinders to do it.
Then a similarly motivatedTrans Am(faster than the Buicks) came out only for 89.
Callaway made a few twin turbo Corvettes in the late 80s, low 13s atover 100 (uberfast for thetime)but krazy expensive. Then the ZR-1 was released in 1990. Also for hellacash.
Then a similarly motivatedTrans Am(faster than the Buicks) came out only for 89.Callaway made a few twin turbo Corvettes in the late 80s, low 13s atover 100 (uberfast for thetime)but krazy expensive. Then the ZR-1 was released in 1990. Also for hellacash.
5th Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,961
From: Daly City,CA
RE: vettes
ORIGINAL: TommyV8
Wait, I thought that there was no such thing as a 1983 Corvette. I could be wrong though.
Wait, I thought that there was no such thing as a 1983 Corvette. I could be wrong though.
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
RE: vettes
ORIGINAL: C6 VETTE
You have a nice collection of cars.......Always nice to see the old school Mustangs still wrecking shop on the strip/streets....[sm=burnout.gif]
ORIGINAL: mjr46
12.20 @ 112was the best with a light launch had I of ever launched hard it might of done a 12 flat but I never wanted to break a drivetrain component
new goal is 11.80's/ 11.90's all motor... the 347 should do that.. I hope
12.20 @ 112was the best with a light launch had I of ever launched hard it might of done a 12 flat but I never wanted to break a drivetrain component
new goal is 11.80's/ 11.90's all motor... the 347 should do that.. I hope
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post