Compound Boost Setup
6th Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,347
From: Columbia, MO
Banned
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Here are a couple of the responses on SVTP that you ignored:
So not ALL SVTPers are idiots... Just most of them. The biggest one being you, Darky... 
Originally Posted by CPRsm
I plan on doing it with a set of 66's in my 67 mustang, and has been done up and over 2k hp. But with large heads and a 400-500+cu motor. That's where it will make it tough for you. Small motor=more boost=more cyl pressure=more heat, etc.
Originally Posted by 61mmstang94
With that turbo on pump gas you probably won't safely make much more than 800. Just being realistic here. The banned guy was a douche, but he's right about a lot of things such as the smaller engine hampering its ability to make more power without going to race gas and if you do go huge on the turbo and stick to pump gas and a street setup you will be hindered by some serious boost lag and it won't be very impressive.
I never understood the obsession with making 1000hp by some people when all they want is a car that can run 9s, but more power to you.
I never understood the obsession with making 1000hp by some people when all they want is a car that can run 9s, but more power to you.
Originally Posted by Mikeyb619
i don't see how that'd be possible on 20psi.... maybe he has a vtec swap tho lol
my guess would be 700-800rwhp maybe?
my guess would be 700-800rwhp maybe?
Originally Posted by Ironhand
My money is just shy of 800rwhp.
I say that because most bolt on Cobra with a 76mm Turbo stock 4.6 without cams put down around the 710-720rwhp range. Atleast from what I seen and keep in mind that is at 15-16lbs as well. But given the other modifications I would say he could get close to or just over 800rwhp but I seriously dont see anything close to 900 let alone 1000.
I say that because most bolt on Cobra with a 76mm Turbo stock 4.6 without cams put down around the 710-720rwhp range. Atleast from what I seen and keep in mind that is at 15-16lbs as well. But given the other modifications I would say he could get close to or just over 800rwhp but I seriously dont see anything close to 900 let alone 1000.
Originally Posted by bullitt2735
nope. I'm think mid 700's at 18/19psi. I do think you'd be able to make a 1000rwhp on pump with a big bore 5.4/ported heads/ etc. with billet 67 turbos or a big single
Originally Posted by THAITED
700 rwhp may be?
Last edited by mfj; May 18, 2010 at 09:37 PM.
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 162
From: Miami, Florida
Banned
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...ed/torque.html
Good article I was reading.
Good article I was reading.
Banned
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
It's an engine dyno, numbnutz... God! Do you get stupider, every day that passes? Apparently you do! LMFAO! You should really work on keeping your meat wrapper shut now.
Banned
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
You're right. That was completely off topic. And no. The stage threes are a proven cam. Why **** with something that's not broken. Now if I had gone turbo, a custom grind would be more optimal but for my twin screw set up, the cams speak for themselves. I actually had lethal performance spec me some custom cams, and all of the specs were the same as the stage threes except for the exhaust lift was 25 thousandths more on the custom set. I'd rather under cam the car than over cam it for obvious reasons, so I just went with the stage threes.
Last edited by mfj; Jun 8, 2010 at 01:30 AM.