SVT Forums

Compound Boost Setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #21  
mfj's Avatar
mfj
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by DarkDigital
IAT2s were at 107 like I said. That's lower the most twin screws and eatons. I highly doubt there will be any problems.
Yeah right bro... My IAT'S are barely over 90 degrees. And that' not even what I was asking. I was asking where your IAT sensor is located.

Also, I like how you keep avoiding my question about how much power you actually made. The kit looks ****** rigged. Just being honest.
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 04:28 PM
  #22  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default

The only issue is that your a/r is a little high - which you did on purpose b/c of the compound plan, but it should still not be to big of an issue
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #23  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default

I would like to see the flowbench on the porters website though, hes pretty cheap
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #24  
83gtragtop's Avatar
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,897
From: DTLA, CA
Default

While compound boost setups are by no means the most efficient, I don't see any reason to bash someone who has obviously put alot of time and effort into their build and steer their thread down a negative road.
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #25  
mfj's Avatar
mfj
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
While compound boost setups are by no means the most efficient, I don't see any reason to bash someone who has obviously put alot of time and effort into their build and steer their thread down a negative road.
You post this kind of stuff online to get people's opinions and advice. Which SOMETIMES, it can be negative. I'm not trying to be a dick, but this, to me, looks like a very poorly designed system.
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #26  
pcs's Avatar
pcs
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,252
From: yuma, az
Default

+1 for doing something different, this is how we figure out what works and what doesnt. so keep at it and see what you figure out and let us know.
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #27  
Ehmark's Avatar
Ehmark
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 891
From: Ca
Default

+1 to mfj the turbo needs an intercooler.
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 11:24 PM
  #28  
DarkDigital's Avatar
DarkDigital
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 162
From: Miami, Florida
Default

Actually it's posted up to give others info. I could honestly care less what someone on the other side of a keyboard has to say about a setup they know nothing about.
This is also why most people who know what they're talking about steer away from mustangforums.
Too many haters and ignorant people.
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #29  
Mustang3GT07's Avatar
Mustang3GT07
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,169
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I second a dyno sheet
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #30  
Gearhead559's Avatar
Gearhead559
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 177
From: ohio
Default

Originally Posted by DarkDigital
Actually it's posted up to give others info. I could honestly care less what someone on the other side of a keyboard has to say about a setup they know nothing about.
This is also why most people who know what they're talking about steer away from mustangforums.
Too many haters and ignorant people.
could not have said it better myself.


the main reason i never post on corral, cause there always seem to be some dumbass , that has worked e7 heads, and his car runs 10's with no other mods.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.