V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

why such hate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #41  
Willem_Black's Avatar
Willem_Black
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 444
From:
Default RE: why such hate?

ORIGINAL: VCS_SSSTANG

ORIGINAL: eaglecatcher

ORIGINAL: Willem_Black

People are just wierd here. It seems like 99% of the people on this part of the forum (don't usually visit the other sections) just wanna fit in and be like everyone else. I have no problem with people "customizing their cars", and if what they do makes it look like crap.....who cares? It's their car, why should it bother me. I can chuckle at them if they look absolutely ridiculous, but I'm not gonna hate on them all day long because they have a huge spoiler. If you like what you did to your car, then more power to you.

And also, I noticed a bunch of funny comments while reading through this post. 1) Sorry cupcakes, but our cars ARE NOT muscle cars. Maybe 40 years ago, but a v6 mustang (and I'm assuming v6 because of the section) is definitely not muscle. There is more "muscle" packed in most of the nissans and mitsubishis of the world as of late. And 2) to the "I like stuff that is functional, not flashy" guys; a lot of the stuff you guys call ricer was intended to be functional. Carbon Fiber (do I really need to explain this one?), the body kits, while most of them are just flashy, the large air dam in the front is meant to allow more air to reach your IC, lowering springs, etc....

My point is, to each his own. I had a Neon with a body kit, carbon fiber hood, 18" wheels and I even purchased neon lights even though they weren't installed. I'm sure if I had pulled up alongside most people on this forum they would have dismissed me as rice. I probably would even be a topic on this board making fun of me. But everything I did was for a purpose, other than the wheels....I immediately regreted that much wieght...but at least I looked good lol.
not muscle cars eh?


Nope anything can be made to be fast, so your argument is null -
Unless you consider the 8second turbo eclipses muscle cars?
Exactly, by that logic even civics are muscle cars....
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #42  
ESG-642T's Avatar
ESG-642T
Buyer Beware
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
Default RE: why such hate?

ORIGINAL: Willem_Black

ORIGINAL: VCS_SSSTANG

ORIGINAL: eaglecatcher

ORIGINAL: Willem_Black

People are just wierd here. It seems like 99% of the people on this part of the forum (don't usually visit the other sections) just wanna fit in and be like everyone else. I have no problem with people "customizing their cars", and if what they do makes it look like crap.....who cares? It's their car, why should it bother me. I can chuckle at them if they look absolutely ridiculous, but I'm not gonna hate on them all day long because they have a huge spoiler. If you like what you did to your car, then more power to you.

And also, I noticed a bunch of funny comments while reading through this post. 1) Sorry cupcakes, but our cars ARE NOT muscle cars. Maybe 40 years ago, but a v6 mustang (and I'm assuming v6 because of the section) is definitely not muscle. There is more "muscle" packed in most of the nissans and mitsubishis of the world as of late. And 2) to the "I like stuff that is functional, not flashy" guys; a lot of the stuff you guys call ricer was intended to be functional. Carbon Fiber (do I really need to explain this one?), the body kits, while most of them are just flashy, the large air dam in the front is meant to allow more air to reach your IC, lowering springs, etc....

My point is, to each his own. I had a Neon with a body kit, carbon fiber hood, 18" wheels and I even purchased neon lights even though they weren't installed. I'm sure if I had pulled up alongside most people on this forum they would have dismissed me as rice. I probably would even be a topic on this board making fun of me. But everything I did was for a purpose, other than the wheels....I immediately regreted that much wieght...but at least I looked good lol.
not muscle cars eh?


Nope anything can be made to be fast, so your argument is null -
Unless you consider the 8second turbo eclipses muscle cars?
Exactly, by that logic even civics are muscle cars....
Yep and s2000s / supras / 350z's etc...
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 01:08 AM
  #43  
Willem_Black's Avatar
Willem_Black
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 444
From:
Default RE: why such hate?

But just to clear things up, in case I'm not really making much sense or speaking clearly.....10 sec mustang would definitely qualify as a "muscle car" as would pretty much any 10 sec car. I'm speaking of a stock production car. Lately base model mustangs just don't strike me as deserving the title muscle any more. This doesn't count for terminators and such....I would have to consider those muscle. But a GT with less than 300 hp off the line? Nope. And definitely not a v6. But when you start working on them, and modding them.....well that's a whole 'nother story....
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #44  
UberNoobIshNess's Avatar
UberNoobIshNess
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35
From:
Default RE: why such hate?

yes crazy spoilers outrageious neon wide bulkey bodykits are not for our stangs.. but i say u can have a decent bodykit with a hint of neon arround and still make it look good asloung as you do not go as far as to turn it into a rice burner your perfectley fine adding what you please to these cares (to an extent lol theres these mexicans with 2 mustangs down the street from me ima try to get some pictures up later tonight yall will loves these guys [:'(])
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #45  
indisposible_teens's Avatar
indisposible_teens
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,581
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
Default RE: why such hate?

Hmm. There is a guy where I live with an 88 or 87 RX-7 that looks like absolute ***. It is three different shades of red and then thebody kit he has is three different shades of primer not to mention it is ugly. The rims on it are ok but everything else is bad. You would think he is a ricer but he has about 25k into it. It has a full suspension set-up and an LS7 in it making a little over 500rwhp, I think he is thesecond fastestimport around here. He says that he keeps it looking like **** because he likes to surprise people. lol I don't know if that would be considered rice or not though, since he did it all with a specific purpose in mind.
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #46  
bingkewl's Avatar
bingkewl
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 57
From:
Default RE: why such hate?

ORIGINAL: UberNoobIshNess

yes crazy spoilers outrageious neon wide bulkey bodykits are not for our stangs.. but i say u can have a decent bodykit with a hint of neon arround and still make it look good asloung as you do not go as far as to turn it into a rice burner your perfectley fine adding what you please to these cares (to an extent lol theres these mexicans with 2 mustangs down the street from me ima try to get some pictures up later tonight yall will loves these guys [:'(])
lmao, that sounds great. i wanna see pics.


and yeah, what i'm talking about is this body kit:


or




with a hint of purple neons. (my cars in the shop getting a new paint job. Black)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
69MustangCoupe393cid
Archive - Parts For Sale
2
Oct 3, 2015 10:33 AM
Ipaman
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
12
Sep 22, 2015 07:01 AM
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
Sep 19, 2015 05:20 PM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
Sep 14, 2015 04:18 PM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
Sep 14, 2015 10:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.