dyno slips
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 454
From:
RE: dyno slips
ORIGINAL: onefast2002ss
i drive a 2002 ss w 6 speed 3.73 gears,lid,throttle bodie,hooker long tubes headders,punched cats,programing,true dual dual exhaust and slp's ram air mod for my scoop,
i drive a 2002 ss w 6 speed 3.73 gears,lid,throttle bodie,hooker long tubes headders,punched cats,programing,true dual dual exhaust and slp's ram air mod for my scoop,
wake up !
tourke??? bahahaha seriously???? hahahaha
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 66
RE: dyno slips
the dyno slip if you learned to read said i ran it 358 i should of put in it only had a cat back and a filter on it at the time and i have not dynoed it scence, but i have added all the other mods i have in there so w/e you stupid a s ses cant read where i say i have a fuggin mustang that is faster than my ls1 and im also looking to buy a 2004 gt{i knida like the look of them} or a gto ???i dont know yet. and for the mpg it took me 2 1/2 tanks to drive from oklahoma to michigan and made it in 11 hours the 6th gear of a camaro will drop the rpm to idle at 50 mph dont believe me go drive one.{the mpg might be lower than 30 by mayby 4 mpg} or look it up on your comp. you may be right that chevy wont make a new camaro,the price of a decently loaded gt doesnt come close to the cost of a decently loaded z28.gm is making a new rwd car because of the zeta2 program which is a chevelle,they canceld zeta 1 last month, but an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28 so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level? to all you badazzes behind the keybords read my entire posts just not the parts you like. I hand built the engine in my mustang i have had the car for 7 years i would sell the camaro before the stang anyday all i wanted to know with this thread was has anyone seen a dyno slip from a 2005 gt which noone has posted yet so obviously you all just want to bark at a chevy and listen to what ford says you car makes..
and i have about 200+ lbs worth of subs and amps in the hatch so ad 200lbs to my weight of my car listen im not like most posters i will prove everything i say if you want pics of the subs on a scale i will post that ill post the specs of the mpg i think slp has them online 18-mpg in the city and 25-mpg on the highwayhttp://www.camarosource.ca/php/camaro_info_db/index.php?year=2002
ORIGINAL: sicride
what year was that ford did claim to many horepower?????
im going to the drag strip this weekend so i will post my times and the times of a c-6 to prove this...
What a douche, can't even keep his story straight. 50 horsepower would need about 500 less lbs weight to make up the difference.. and thats if a manufacturer were stupid enough to rate the cars power at the wheels. Your car according to your first post makes about 100 more horsepower than the Mustang and you're saying that 200lb weight difference should make it closer than 3 car lengths? I'm sorry that you are such a bad driver a '05 Mustang stayed 3 cars behind a car with 100more horsepower than it. Oh wait nevermind, you haven't actually dynoed yet cause yer doing it shortly.. If you can lie about dynoing your car I guess a {03} cobra isn't hard to lie about either..
And if you get 30mpg in your SS I think some people would start trading in their 4cylinders for V8's they are the real economy cars.. WTF?
ORIGINAL: onefast2002ss
have any of you 2005 300hp gt's have a dyno slip to prove this. Im sorry but i have raced about a dozen 05 ponies and all of them lose by at least 3 car lenghts. My ride is a 35th anniv ss camaro with dyno slips of a 358 hp run but the stang weighs less and has 300??Is your 300 at the flywheel or at the wheels, or is it like the 99?{i cant remember year} that was rated 15 hp more than it made?
have any of you 2005 300hp gt's have a dyno slip to prove this. Im sorry but i have raced about a dozen 05 ponies and all of them lose by at least 3 car lenghts. My ride is a 35th anniv ss camaro with dyno slips of a 358 hp run but the stang weighs less and has 300??Is your 300 at the flywheel or at the wheels, or is it like the 99?{i cant remember year} that was rated 15 hp more than it made?
ORIGINAL: onefast2002ss
i drive a 2002 ss w 6 speed 3.73 gears,lid,throttle bodie,hooker long tubes headders,punched cats,programing,true dual dual exhaust and slp's ram air mod for my scoop, will dyno shortly but if it beats a 400 hp c-6 vette than i guess a {03} cobra isnt to hard ...
i drive a 2002 ss w 6 speed 3.73 gears,lid,throttle bodie,hooker long tubes headders,punched cats,programing,true dual dual exhaust and slp's ram air mod for my scoop, will dyno shortly but if it beats a 400 hp c-6 vette than i guess a {03} cobra isnt to hard ...
What a douche, can't even keep his story straight. 50 horsepower would need about 500 less lbs weight to make up the difference.. and thats if a manufacturer were stupid enough to rate the cars power at the wheels. Your car according to your first post makes about 100 more horsepower than the Mustang and you're saying that 200lb weight difference should make it closer than 3 car lengths? I'm sorry that you are such a bad driver a '05 Mustang stayed 3 cars behind a car with 100more horsepower than it. Oh wait nevermind, you haven't actually dynoed yet cause yer doing it shortly.. If you can lie about dynoing your car I guess a {03} cobra isn't hard to lie about either..
And if you get 30mpg in your SS I think some people would start trading in their 4cylinders for V8's they are the real economy cars.. WTF?
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 284
RE: dyno slips
ORIGINAL: onefast2002ss
the dyno slip, if you learned to read, said i ran the car at 358 (whp/rwhp). i should of put in that it only had a cat back and a filter on it at the time and i have not dynoed it scence (since), but i have added all the other mods i have in there so w/e. you stupid a s ses cant read what i say. i have a fuggin mustang that is faster than my ls1 and im also looking to buy a 2004 gt{i knida like the look of them} or a gto ???i dont know yet. As for the mpg it took me 2 1/2 tanks to drive from oklahoma to michigan and made it in 11 hours. the 6th gear of a camaro will drop the rpm to idle at 50 mph; dont believe me go drive one. (I might add that I have driven one a number of times thank you..) {the mpg might be lower than 30 by mayby 4 mpg} or look it up on your comp. you may be right that chevy wont make a new camaro,the price of a decently loaded gt doesnt come close to the cost of a decently loaded z28.gm is making a new rwd car because of the zeta2 program which is a chevelle. they canceld zeta 1 last month. an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28. so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level? (That didn't make any god damn sense) to all you badazzes behind the keybords: read my entire posts, not just the parts you like. I hand built the engine in my mustang, i have had the car for 7 years. i would sell the camaro before the stang anyday. all i wanted to know with this thread was: had (keep your tense fool) anyone seen a dyno slip from a 2005 gt, which noone has posted yet. so obviously you all just want to bark at a chevy and listen to what ford says you car makes...
...(quotes)...
and i have about 200+ lbs worth of subs and amps in the hatch. so ad 200lbs to my weight of my car. listen im not like most posters i will prove everything i say if you want pics of the subs on a scale- i will post that. ill post the specs of the mpg. i think slp has them online 18-mpg in the city and 25-mpg on the highwayhttp://www.camarosource.ca/php/camaro_info_db/index.php?year=2002
the dyno slip, if you learned to read, said i ran the car at 358 (whp/rwhp). i should of put in that it only had a cat back and a filter on it at the time and i have not dynoed it scence (since), but i have added all the other mods i have in there so w/e. you stupid a s ses cant read what i say. i have a fuggin mustang that is faster than my ls1 and im also looking to buy a 2004 gt{i knida like the look of them} or a gto ???i dont know yet. As for the mpg it took me 2 1/2 tanks to drive from oklahoma to michigan and made it in 11 hours. the 6th gear of a camaro will drop the rpm to idle at 50 mph; dont believe me go drive one. (I might add that I have driven one a number of times thank you..) {the mpg might be lower than 30 by mayby 4 mpg} or look it up on your comp. you may be right that chevy wont make a new camaro,the price of a decently loaded gt doesnt come close to the cost of a decently loaded z28.gm is making a new rwd car because of the zeta2 program which is a chevelle. they canceld zeta 1 last month. an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28. so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level? (That didn't make any god damn sense) to all you badazzes behind the keybords: read my entire posts, not just the parts you like. I hand built the engine in my mustang, i have had the car for 7 years. i would sell the camaro before the stang anyday. all i wanted to know with this thread was: had (keep your tense fool) anyone seen a dyno slip from a 2005 gt, which noone has posted yet. so obviously you all just want to bark at a chevy and listen to what ford says you car makes...
...(quotes)...
and i have about 200+ lbs worth of subs and amps in the hatch. so ad 200lbs to my weight of my car. listen im not like most posters i will prove everything i say if you want pics of the subs on a scale- i will post that. ill post the specs of the mpg. i think slp has them online 18-mpg in the city and 25-mpg on the highwayhttp://www.camarosource.ca/php/camaro_info_db/index.php?year=2002
25mpg is not 30mpg, 30mpg on the highway is not the mpg you get on a regular basis. Lets not brag about 30mpg unless you say that you are getting that mileage on the highway, originally. I can read, I can read just fine, but you can't write. Usually it is a good idea to end one comment before you start another- (Refer to bold edits in your post). It is so difficult to deal with morons.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,370
From: bay area
RE: dyno slips
" but an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28 so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level?"
So you dont think the extra 20 HP and extra torque would matter? If is was not an improvement they why have an SS? And you still paid 5K more too.. ohh.. and its also ugly [sm=icon_ladiesman.gif] (cheap shot sorry)
http://www.poltergeist.us/page/SS/Docs/SSsticker.html
So you dont think the extra 20 HP and extra torque would matter? If is was not an improvement they why have an SS? And you still paid 5K more too.. ohh.. and its also ugly [sm=icon_ladiesman.gif] (cheap shot sorry)
http://www.poltergeist.us/page/SS/Docs/SSsticker.html
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 66
RE: dyno slips
ORIGINAL: lostsoul
" but an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28 so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level?"
So you dont think the extra 20 HP and extra torque would matter? If is was not an improvement they why have an SS? And you still paid 5K more too.. ohh.. and its also ugly [sm=icon_ladiesman.gif] (cheap shot sorry)
http://www.poltergeist.us/page/SS/Docs/SSsticker.html
" but an ss is only 20 hp more than a z28 so how is a mustang gt a mid level and the ss is high level?"
So you dont think the extra 20 HP and extra torque would matter? If is was not an improvement they why have an SS? And you still paid 5K more too.. ohh.. and its also ugly [sm=icon_ladiesman.gif] (cheap shot sorry)
http://www.poltergeist.us/page/SS/Docs/SSsticker.html
4th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,370
From: bay area
RE: dyno slips
I got 20K for it and thats with everything and little miles in perfect condition. If you paid 2100K you got a good deal. Much better then average... but as in the other link that was a 30K I could saved moeny if I bought an 05 in 08. So in a nut shell in 2002 an ss went for 30K and with in 3 years (I dont know when you bought it) but you got it for 21K with only 6K miles???? doesnt that tell you something? [sm=icon_quiet.gif]
Engine: V8 5.7 Liter
Trans: 6 Speed Manual
Drive: Rear Wheel Drive
Mileage: 40,000
Search Listings for This Car
List Your Car For Sale Online
Quick New Car Price Quote
Free CARFAX Record Check
Auto Loans from 4.49% APR
Insurance Quote
Print "For Sale" Sign
Payment Calculator
Equipment
SS Pkg
Air Conditioning
Power Steering
Power Windows
Power Door Locks
Tilt Wheel
Cruise Control
AM/FM Stereo
Multi Compact Disc
Premium Sound
Dual Front Air Bags
ABS (4-Wheel)
Dual Power Seats
T-Bar Roof
Rear Spoiler
Premium Wheels
Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent
"Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks new, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. This vehicle has never had any paint or body work and is free of rust. The vehicle has a clean title history and will pass a smog and safety inspection. The engine compartment is clean, with no fluid leaks and is free of any wear or visible defects. The vehicle also has complete and verifiable service records. Less than 5% of all used vehicles fall into this category.
Private Party Value Search Local Listings for This Car $20,700
Private Party Value is what a buyer can expect to pay when buying a used car from a private party. The Private Party Value assumes the vehicle is sold "As Is" and carries no warranty (other than the continuing factory warranty). The final sale price may vary depending on the vehicle's actual condition and local market conditions. This value may also be used to derive Fair Market Value for insurance and vehicle donation purposes.
Engine: V8 5.7 Liter
Trans: 6 Speed Manual
Drive: Rear Wheel Drive
Mileage: 40,000
Search Listings for This Car
List Your Car For Sale Online
Quick New Car Price Quote
Free CARFAX Record Check
Auto Loans from 4.49% APR
Insurance Quote
Print "For Sale" Sign
Payment Calculator
Equipment
SS Pkg
Air Conditioning
Power Steering
Power Windows
Power Door Locks
Tilt Wheel
Cruise Control
AM/FM Stereo
Multi Compact Disc
Premium Sound
Dual Front Air Bags
ABS (4-Wheel)
Dual Power Seats
T-Bar Roof
Rear Spoiler
Premium Wheels
Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent
"Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks new, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. This vehicle has never had any paint or body work and is free of rust. The vehicle has a clean title history and will pass a smog and safety inspection. The engine compartment is clean, with no fluid leaks and is free of any wear or visible defects. The vehicle also has complete and verifiable service records. Less than 5% of all used vehicles fall into this category.
Private Party Value Search Local Listings for This Car $20,700
Private Party Value is what a buyer can expect to pay when buying a used car from a private party. The Private Party Value assumes the vehicle is sold "As Is" and carries no warranty (other than the continuing factory warranty). The final sale price may vary depending on the vehicle's actual condition and local market conditions. This value may also be used to derive Fair Market Value for insurance and vehicle donation purposes.
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 66
RE: dyno slips
ORIGINAL: lostsoul
I got 20K for it and thats with everything and little miles in perfect condition. If you paid 2100K you got a good deal. Much better then average... but as in the other link that was a 30K I could saved moeny if I bought an 05 in 08. So in a nut shell in 2002 an ss went for 30K and with in 3 years (I dont know when you bought it) but you got it for 21K with only 6K miles???? doesnt that tell you something? [sm=icon_quiet.gif]
I got 20K for it and thats with everything and little miles in perfect condition. If you paid 2100K you got a good deal. Much better then average... but as in the other link that was a 30K I could saved moeny if I bought an 05 in 08. So in a nut shell in 2002 an ss went for 30K and with in 3 years (I dont know when you bought it) but you got it for 21K with only 6K miles???? doesnt that tell you something? [sm=icon_quiet.gif]
2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Super Sport
2 Door Coupe (*)
March 31, 2005 print this vehicle report
Original MSRP: $28,620
Low Retail Average Retail High Retail
Base Price
$20,250 $25,900 $28,650
TOTAL PRICE $25,900
$28,650 *
you must be going to the wrong web site this is the official nada website. I got the car from an older gentleman who didnt want it a year and a half ago. The car was in prestine condition all it needed was an oil change. I have not had a problem yet.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,370
From: bay area
RE: dyno slips
I got it from that little web site kelly blue book. Maybe your right they dont know what there doing... anyway,.... hell... I dont have anything else to say.. I think I stretched this post out far enough.. hahaha.. You got a good car and it seems a great deal. Still no reason to bag on my 05 mustang that I just bought 
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh