Audi S4
About the new automatic s4.. its my friends... he raced my car, an s2000 and a z4 off roll and lost to all of us...
s2000 (exhaust, top down, passenger)
z4 (stock top down)
S4 ( 2 passenger)
Mustang (1 passenger)
racers were from a 40mph roll
He also raced a 4 door g37s off roll and got beat pretty bad..
Off launch the automatic s4 beat the s2k but not by much only a car and they stopped at 70
s2000 (exhaust, top down, passenger)
z4 (stock top down)
S4 ( 2 passenger)
Mustang (1 passenger)
racers were from a 40mph roll
He also raced a 4 door g37s off roll and got beat pretty bad..
Off launch the automatic s4 beat the s2k but not by much only a car and they stopped at 70
ORIGINAL: scg87
Yeah, they def handle more nicely than a New Edge or f-Body, I'll give you that. Since it's so structured, it won't bebad. All the events we have hear are only broken down into like two classes.[>:]And yeah, Miatas are autoX monsters. I'd love to have an S2K built for it.....
Yeah, they def handle more nicely than a New Edge or f-Body, I'll give you that. Since it's so structured, it won't bebad. All the events we have hear are only broken down into like two classes.[>:]And yeah, Miatas are autoX monsters. I'd love to have an S2K built for it.....
I know you are familiar with top gear... the stig lap times are actually somewhat suprising for the car IMO
Subaru Impreza STi WRX WR1
1.29.4
Volkswagen Golf W12 GTI
1.29.6
Alfa 3.7 GTA Autodelta
1.30.0
Ford Shelby GT500
1.30.0
Vauxhall Monaro VXR
1.30.1
Subaru Impreza STI
1.30.1
Volkswagen Golf R32
1.30.4
Aston Martin DB7 GT
1.30.4
Audi S4
1.30.9
^^^ the monaro VXR is the same thing as the LS2 GTO here.... that's not too shabby being such a heavy car IMO
^^^^^^^^^^
Although I like top gear for doing what they do. They are truly unique with that board of lap times.
I dont find that board to be accurate.... Only because they are in the UK and are constantly comparing Wet/Dry track conditions as if they are equal.
We all know cars will lap faster in the dry. But on Top Gear they disregard that fact and include the different conditions on their "wall"
Although I like top gear for doing what they do. They are truly unique with that board of lap times.
I dont find that board to be accurate.... Only because they are in the UK and are constantly comparing Wet/Dry track conditions as if they are equal.
We all know cars will lap faster in the dry. But on Top Gear they disregard that fact and include the different conditions on their "wall"
I like 5th gears system better though
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTP8QHCThKA
^^ that's the LS1
everything can't be perfect, at least both give you a standard to go by
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTP8QHCThKA
^^ that's the LS1
everything can't be perfect, at least both give you a standard to go by
Original: scg87
Yea all of us expected to get owned mainly because s4's have always been compared to m3's so we knew the level the car was on, but for some reason it wasnt what we thought it was going to be. Whats the weight of the car? Maybe that can play a factor
Those are seriously not the expected results. The S2K and Z4 should've been cake, even from a roll....
^^^auto FTL. I raced a manual s4 back when I had the new edge and he coudln't get in front, but I couldn't either. And he had a passenger and it was just me in the car, and like I said he had some kind of exhaust, I sure it was just a catback but every little bit helps right?


